When I was 12, I had to memorize the poem “The Blind Men and the Elephant” for a school competition. I’ve never forgotten it.
Six blind men describe with great certainty the mighty elephant, each touching only one part of it, never the whole animal. The one part they do experience and describe seems very accurate, but their overall conclusions about the whole elephant are wildly and laughably distorted. They assume their experience and viewpoint is the totality of the creature. No doubt, six religions were formed that day.
I call that Partial Truth. Truth frees us, but Partial Truth makes us prisoners to lopsided and distorted viewpoints and agendas of men and women, no matter how well intentioned, who believe their Partial Truth is The Whole Truth. Many sincere people believe and act like the one small part they have touched and described of the mystery of our ineffable (indescribable) and cosmic God is The Whole Truth about this God who is in love with all.
Then they try to propagate and package and sell it as His All Encompassing Truth. That’s how we end up with a nicely packaged God who is expected to perform according to our limited knowledge. We forget that, according to the Psalmist, God is in heaven and He does what He wants.
Most systems of the world—especially the religious ones—flourish on Partial Truth. It’s fatal to any system to let followers who have never touched more than the trunk, suddenly discover that there is a tail or an ear or a tusk. Or that there might even be an amazing creature far greater than anyone has ever imagined.
Before you keep exploring a relational, supernatural Kingdom of God that has been freely offered to ALL and a King of a Kingdom who really loves ALL, count the costs. You may find yourself labeled as the enemy, or a heretic. And when your religious system no longer has use for you, you may find yourself shunned and shamed for daring to believe there is more than the tail the denomination or political party or economic system is peddling. This is particularly ugly in our religious systems because here it is done in the name of the One who has come to set all free. (History does not lie.)
The poem ends telling us that the six blind men “fought loud and long, stiff and strong” to advance their particular view of the elephant. Make you think of anything happening in certain circles today? If it does, the poem’s ending should be taken to heart:
“…each was partly in the right,
And all were in the wrong!”
January 17th, 2012 at 4:49 pm
Wow David love it. Makes me wonder how much more of the Father we will experience in the future and to pray that I recognize Him when I do.
January 17th, 2012 at 7:00 pm
Insightful. I loved reading this, Mr. VanCronkhite.
January 19th, 2012 at 12:29 pm
Not to be too rational about it all, but there is, of course, one Grand Truth in this story: that the storyteller has the Actual Truth. Yes, each person sees part of the truth, but we who read the story know the Actual Truth, and will henceforth filter all other truths through this. You say you’re a Buddhist? Well, that’s part of the truth, brother! You say you’re a Christian? Well, you got some good stuff there, sister! You’re an atheist? Well, thanks for helping us see something of the divine order of the cosmos!
The problem is that all of these superficially affirming comments deny what the person is actually saying. The Christian believes that Jesus is THE way to God, the Buddhist that reality IS maya, the atheist that there really ISN’T any evidence for (any) god. To say these all have part of the truth is to say that there is no truth (except my truth, which is that there is no truth). It’s every bit as exclusivist and particular as the beliefs of the most conservative religionist. Ultiimately, if you want to believe it, it’s a free country, but we don’t need any nonsense about it being so accepting and open-minded. It makes for a sort of civil peace, I suppose, but scratch below the surface and there’s just as much of a metanarrative as in any religion. Saying that all beliefs are just part of the truth (except my interpretation of your truth) whitewashes differences and is ultimately more a form of apathy than love or acceptance.